Health and biotech monitoring

How to structure monitoring and documents in healthcare/biotech with generative AI?

• ChatGPT
• Claude
• Microsoft Copilot

1960 € per session, excl. VAT

In short

This course is for administrative, quality, research, and coordination teams in healthcare or biotech. Participants learn to use tools like ChatGPT, Claude, or Microsoft Copilot to structure their monitoring, documents, and coordination based on fictional cases. They produce a sourced documentary synthesis and a coordination document, thereby enhancing their professional efficiency.

Why this training?

The problem

Healthcare/biotech teams struggle to effectively structure monitoring and documents in complex cases.

What it costs today

This leads to dispersed information, decisions based on incomplete or misunderstood data, and redundant efforts.

Why this skill

This skill is necessary to organize and analyze large volumes of regulatory, scientific, or administrative information.

What you gain

The participant and the company gain improved quality of produced documents, increased autonomy in information management, and greater reliability of documentation processes.

Objectives of this training

• Identify documentary and coordination tasks suitable for assistive tools like ChatGPT, Claude, or Microsoft Copilot.
• Compare public documents and locate their relevant source passages.
• Distinguish results, hypotheses, and limitations of extracted information.
• Prepare a clear and compliant procedure or meeting note.
• Adapt the language of documents without altering their original meaning.
• Test deliverables to detect omissions, errors, or outdated information.

Who is it for and what are the prerequisites?

Roles and tasks concerned

• Quality managers in healthcare/biotech
• Research associates in healthcare/biotech
• Project coordinators in healthcare/biotech
• Administrative staff in healthcare/biotech

Prior skills

• AI Fundamentals and AI Prompting completed, or equivalent experience (a learning prerequisite, not a registration condition).
• Knowledge of internal documentary processes
• Familiarity with managing regulatory or scientific information
• Understanding of organizational priorities
• A paid subscription to an AI solution offering the features used, the organisation’s authorisation for third-party tools, and the actual accounts and access rights.

To prepare before the session

• A personal computer per participant.
• Access to the selected assistive tools for the session.
• A specific business case to work on, using fictitious or anonymized data.

What you will work on

1. Choosing an appropriate case

   The participant is able to identify relevant documentary and coordination tasks for applying assistive tools.

2. Reading and summarizing rigorously

   The participant acquires the ability to compare public documents and find their source passages with discernment.

3. Producing a professional deliverable

   The participant is able to prepare professional documents such as procedures or meeting notes.

4. Setting up a validation circuit

   The participant develops the ability to test deliverables to ensure their quality, confidentiality, and compliance.

What you take away

• A sourced documentary synthesis for a fictitious case.
• A coordination document developed for a fictitious case.
• A validation checklist for the produced documents.

Method and assessment

• Demonstrations with explanations using a concrete case
• Guided exercises followed by application to your role
• Peer review of results and source verification
• An individual or team action plan

Assessment is formative: participants complete and review a practical case linked to the intended deliverable (A sourced document synthesis, a coordination document and a validation checklist). Criteria include meeting the brief, accuracy, checks performed and the ability to explain decisions. Each participant identifies an application to test in their own work.

Frequently asked questions

What will be the concrete result for the team after this training?

Your team will produce better structured documents with improved source traceability. This will foster more informed decision-making and reduce time spent searching for information. Collaboration around documents will also be facilitated.

Who should attend this session and what are the prerequisites?

Quality managers, research associates, project coordinators, and administrative staff are the most relevant participants. It is necessary to have knowledge of internal documentary processes and familiarity with the regulatory or scientific information of the company.

What data or documents will be used and how will confidential information be protected?

The training exclusively uses fictitious cases, public documents, or anonymized data. No confidential documents from your organization will be processed. A computer per participant is required, with access to the defined tools.

What type of exercise will be carried out on a practical case?

Participants will work on a fictitious case to produce a sourced documentary synthesis. They will also develop a coordination document and create a validation checklist. This includes comparing public documents and preparing procedures.

What are the limitations of assistive tools and who validates the final result?

Assistive tools provide help with structuring and synthesizing, but do not replace human expertise. The final result must always be validated by a subject matter expert from your organization. The training includes detecting potential omissions or errors.

How can the training adapt to our business and specific cases?

The session is designed to allow the application of principles to fictitious cases, but modules such as 'Choosing an appropriate case' and 'Producing a professional deliverable' are foundational. They enable the transfer of methods to your organization's real-world situations at the end of the session. The examples are generalizable.